The Office of the President Elect at its website Change.Gov has invited us all to submit our stories and ideas in the effort to bring about change for the better in the USA. Diane Jay, who is an Obama Fellow and the facilitator of Tarrant County Bridge to Change, said at our first meeting last month that they (meaning the people at Change.Gov) are waiting on our input and that they will read our submissions. Below is my submission:
I’m Ridge Dickey, a semi-retired attorney who lives in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas. A short version of my story ending at a house meeting at Diana Jay’s home on December 14 appeared in the Fort Worth Star Telegram on Sunday, December 28. The unabridged version was posted on the local blog West and Clear a week before that. To make a long story short, I campaigned for Obama in the primary and the run against McCain, canvassing and phone banking in Roswell NM the last ten days through November 4. My primary agenda in becoming active in the campaign and continuing with the post-election grassroots effort is concern for my kids and grandkids and your kids and grandkids. I want them to have a future that provides them with opportunities to fulfill their potentials.
I’m not sure where Chicago is headed with the grassroots effort. I do believe it has the potential to organize the community that is the United States of America, organize local communities throughout the United States, and bring to main street the opportunity to actively participate in the country’s governance. Below is my concept of a structure to facilitate the process.
A Proposed Structure:
(Good governance is good politics)
Purpose of Organizational Structure. To put in place a grassroots organizational structure composed of individuals and organizations that reaches all the way to Washington and supports a process to identify challenges in our local and national communities, to aid in finding the solutions to the challenges, that works with the local and national community that is the United States of America to implement the solutions, that continuously inventories itself for the purpose of improving the process, and that is organized to survive decades beyond Obama’s presidency (the “Process”).
An objective of the Process is to leverage financial resources by tapping into the talent pool which is the United States of America, with the Process providing to all those willing continuing opportunities to participate actively in the Process.
An objective of the Process to restore governance to main street and to curtail the influence of special interest groups.
The Process will operate in keeping with the strategy of non-violence in rhetoric, will be non-partisan, and will respect the rights of all to have and share their opinions.
Organizational Structure. The primary structure is a network of three substructures and all others whom the three substructures work with and serve. The three substructures are:
1. At least one field office of the Obama administration in all fifty states (each referred to as an “FO”).
2 A parent 501(c)(4) and local member 501(c)(4)s (referred to as a “4 organization” or just “4″);
3. A parent 501(c)(3) public charity and local member 501(c)(3)s (referred to as a “3 organization” or just “3″);
Instead of a conventional hierarchical organizational chart, the vision is a globe with lines connecting all participants to other participants, looking similar to a globe with lines depicting airline routes to hubs around the world and then to regional hubs etc, with this globe supported by a three member base, each member representative of the three substructures (FOs, 4s and 3s) that support and merge with the globe. The surface of a sphere has no center.
The idea is that communication among the participants in the Process is as unrestrictive as is the Internet allows. The Internet makes such an organizational structure possible. The structure provides an environment in which its constituent parts via the Internet will self-organize like the brain of an infant seemingly empty at birth that develops an exponentially increasing set of connections that ultimate produces self awareness and functionality of the individual.
The 4s and the 3s will be non-partisan and will promote no ideology beyond an inclusive democracy wherein all our citizens have the opportunity to achieve their potentials and to participate actively in the Process.
Purpose of the Field Offices. Not only did the fifty state Obama campaign strategy win most of the battleground states and secure the blue states, its presence in the states that went red put pressure on opposition resources. Furthermore, the effort in the red states increased Obama’s national popular vote.
Just as important, the Obama supporters in red states felt that were included in the campaign because we were in fact included. Now we have the opportunity to take part in the governance our local communities, our states and the nation.
The Obama administration establishing an FO in all states sends the message that main street will have a direct line to the White House just as our nascent Tarrant County Bridge to Change has a direct line to Chicago through Diane Jay. Each FO will liaison with local 4s and 3s and possibly local governmental entities (local means a whole state down to a municipality depending on circumstances).
Purpose of the 501(c)(4)s. There will be a parent 4 and any number of local 4s. Unlike a 3 organization, treasury regulations allow a social welfare 4 organization to be an action organization, that is, it may influence legislation and participate in a political campaigns on a partisan basis. However, if it gets involved in political campaigns its a 527 which is taboo. Therefor the organizational documents would prohibit using funds or resources for an exempt function within the meaning of Section 527(e)(2).
The parent 4 would come-up with a pro forma set of organizational documents for the local 4s. The parent 4 will provide guidance to the local 4s. The local 4s can be active in local and state legislation, including proposing and promoting new laws and codes and changes to existing ones, all for the betterment of the social welfare of the community. The local 4s can be member organizations so that dues will in part provide the funding. It can network with and support other local organizations with common interests.
Purpose of the 501(c)(3)s. There will be a parent 3 and any number of local 3s. The parent 3 will be have to be a public charity under 170(b)(1(A)(vi) to qualify it to receive income tax deductible contributions and to avoid private foundation status. Qualifying as such shouldn’t be too difficult because of the grassroots base and hopefully hundreds of thousands of members of 4s who will make contributions to the parent 3.
The parent and local 3s will be involved in doing good works. They can receive grants from government entities and from private foundations. I think of the parent and local 3s as being hope based as opposed to faith based. Faith connotes an allegiance to religious ideologies whereas hope has universal spiritual connotations.
The local 3s will be support organizations of the parent 3 within the meaning of 509(a)(3) which automatically exempts them from private foundation status. That also means the local 3s don’t have to meet the public charity test to qualify them to receive income tax deductible contributions. 170(b)(1)(A)(viii).
The local 3s will be able to network with other 501(c)(3)s including churches, temples and synagogues and other religious organizations. An objective will be to gain their trust rather than to be perceived as a threat to their turf.
The local 3s will be networking with the local 4s and the local FOs, which means direct communication with the White House.
When thinking through brother-sister 4 and 3 organizations, I was concerned that the IRS would see the two so closely related that the activities of the 4 would be attributed to the 3, which would torpedo the concept. I knew that the Sierra Club (SC) is actively engaged in influencing legislation so I took a look at its tax exempt status. The IRS revoked its 3 status in the 60s as a result of its fighting the feds on proposed dams in the Grand Canyon so it morphed into a 4. At that time, the SC set up a 3 named the SC Foundation which is a public charity. So there is precedent for a brother-sister 4 and 3.
Summary. Having FOs in all states provides main street with face to face contact with the White House. The local and parent 4s can provide a feedback loop to the White House. However, it will take time for a local 4 to gain credibility in the local community. Main street may see local 4s as primarily a continuation of the Obama’s political campaign for reelection in 2012. That has been asserted in blogs already.
The local 4s provide local citizens the opportunity to get actively involved in the solutions to the challenges we face. The parent 4 provides a means of keeping the local 4s in focus.
The parent and local 3s will also provide solutions. They can seek funding sources not available to the 4s.
Finally, an operating principle of the Process has to be to work with the elite (e.g. elected officials, CEOs, government agencies, churches) and not outflank them; even though the Process is grassroots, it’s not populist. Instead of trying to displace institutions in the community whose roles and objectives are in common with ours, the Process must be as much a facilitator as it is an implementer.
Ridge Dickey
Fort Worth, Texas